How should a democratic state fight terrorism? This is the question discussed by Michael Ignatieff in his latest book. Ignatieff explores several. The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of ht t/ hosted at. Terror by Michael Ignatieff. Prnnceton, NJ: tnlv os. ‘ [email protected]; Princeton. In this volume, Michael Ignatieff seeks to answer the following question: should liberal democracies be free of violence or are ‘lesser evils’ justified under the.

Author: Vogar Kehn
Country: Ecuador
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 12 March 2011
Pages: 247
PDF File Size: 9.32 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.26 Mb
ISBN: 564-6-56098-990-6
Downloads: 91573
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazilkree

In this book Ignatieff argues that the war against terrorism requires acts which go beyond those permitted by our constitutional restraints and protections of the recognition of individual legal rights. Purdy goes on to highlight what he sees as problems with Ignatieff’s five tests for coercive measures, in that some of the individual tests are too indeterminate, and that he provides no detail as to how each of competing considerations expressed in the tests is to be weighed against each other.

Patrick Hayden – – Routledge.

Evil and Lesset Relations: Hannah Arendt and International Theory. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. He shows how the most potent response to terror has been force, decisive and direct, yet restrained. Find it on Scholar. But its use – in a liberal democracy – must be measured.


The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror – Wikipedia

We may need to kill to fight the greater evil of terrorism, ignatleff we must never pretend that doing so is anything better than a lesser evil.

Human Suffering in an Age of Terror. Randall Dipert – – Journal of Military Ethics 5 1: Cover of the first edition.

Monthly downloads Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart. Must we fight terrorism with terror and torture with torture?

The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror

This page was last edited on 8 Decemberat ecil Upshur – – Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 2: To balance this necessary erosion of liberal freedoms and rights, Ignatieff presents a framework of judicial review, executive and Congressional oversight, free debate and limits on interrogation. Request removal from index. Christine Chwaszcza – – Nomos.

Retrieved from ” https: In the age of terrorism Michael Ignatieff argues that we must not shrink from the use of violence.

Moral Responsibility and Global Justice: Gabriella Slomp – – Palgrave-Macmillan. The Rule of Law and Equality. Ethics for International Business: Retrieved 18 February Edinburgh University Press Terror, Torture, and War.

History of Western Philosophy. Writing in The New York TimesRonald Steel writes that “in concocting a formula for a little evil lite to combat the true evildoers, Michael Ignatieff has not provided, as his subtitle states, a code of ‘political ethics in an age of terror’ but rather an elegantly packaged manual of national self-justification. This book was written in to address questions of human rights and humanitarian policy which arose as a result of the issues surrounding the War on Terrorparticularly with regard to the US Foreign Policies of the time including the detention of terrorist suspects without trial at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.


Terrorism and the Uses ginatieff Terror. The book is based on a series of six lectures that Ignatieff gave at the University of Edinburgh in as part of the Gifford Lectures.

And lfsser must not fool ourselves that whatever we do in the name of freedom and democracy is good. A Human Rights Approach. In making this case, Ignatieff traces the modern history of terrorism and counter-terrorism, from the nihilists of Czarist Ignatierf and the militias of Weimar Germany to the IRA and the unprecedented menace of Al Qaeda. Political Ethics in an Age of Terror.

Must we sacrifice civil liberty to protect public safety?